Chapter
9: The Basic Food Groups, or Much of What You Have
Been Taught About Diet is Probably Wrong /
Read It Online!
PAGE
1 2
3
Get
Entire
Article
(119K) Tip:
To save without viewing, right-click and choose
Save Target As from pop-up menu |
Fat
Call it the Big
Fat Lie. Fat has, through no real fault of its own,
become the great demon of the American dietary scene.
It is no myth that one-third of Americans are overweight.
It is, however, a myth that Americans are overweight
due to excessive fat consumption.
The body acquires fat in
two ways. The primary source of body fat for most
Americans is not dietary fat but carbohydrate, which
is converted to blood sugar and then, with the aid
of insulin, to fat by fat cells. Remember, insulin
is our main fat-building hormone. Eat a plate of pasta.
Your blood sugar will rise and your insulin level
(if you have Type II diabetes or are not diabetic)
will also rise in order to cover the jump in blood
sugar. All the blood sugar that is not burned as energy
or stored as glycogen is turned into fat. So you could,
in theory, acquire more body fat from eating a high-carbohydrate
"fat-free" dessert than you would from eating
a tender steak nicely marbled with fat.
The other manner in which
your body acquires fat is by eating it. Fat by itself
doesn't taste particularly good. Pour yourself a tall,
frosty mug of cooking oil and you'll likely gag trying
to get it down. Take that same oil and french-fry
potatoes in it, or drizzle some olive oil on your
salad with vinegar, and suddenly it's delicious. The
effect dietary fat has is to enhance flavor.
When you eat food that
contains fat (triglycerides), your digestive system
breaks it down into fatty acids. These your body can
burn or store, or convert into other compounds, depending
on what it requires. Consequently, fat is always in
flux in the body, being stored, appearing in the blood,
and being converted to energy. The amount of triglycerides
in your bloodstream at any given time will be determined
by your heredity, your level of exercise, your blood
sugar levels, your diet, your ratio of lean body mass
(muscle) to visceral (abdominal) fat, and especially
by your recent consumption of carbohydrate. The slim
and fit tend to be very sensitive (i.e., responsive)
to insulin and have low serum levels not only of triglycerides
but insulin as well. But even their triglyceride levels
will increase after a high-carbohydrate meal, as excess
blood sugar is converted to fat. The higher the ratio
of lean body mass to abdominal fat, the more sensitive
to insulin you'll tend to be. In the obese, triglycerides
tend to be present at high levels in the bloodstream
all the time. (This is sometimes exaggerated during
weight loss because fat is appearing in the bloodstream
as it comes out of storage to be converted into energy.)
Not only are high triglyceride levels a direct cause
of insulin resistance, but they also contribute to
fatty deposits on the walls of your blood vessels
(atherosclerosis), which are a frequent factor in
heart disease, strokes, and amputations not caused
by injury. Research demonstrates that if you injected
high concentrations of triglycerides into the blood
supply of the liver of a well-conditioned athlete,
someone very sensitive to insulin, she would become
insulin-resistant until the excess triglyceride had
been cleared from the bloodstream. (The most important
thing to note here is that insulin resistance, as
well as other risk factors for the diabetic complications
I just mentioned, can be reversed by eating less carbohydrate,
normalizing blood sugars, and slimming down, which
we'll discuss in greater detail later on.)
If you become overweight,
you'll produce more insulin, become insulin-resistant
(which will require you to produce yet more insulin),
and become yet more overweight because you'll create
more fat and store more fat. You'll enter the vicious
circle depicted in Figure 1-1.
Consider that steak I mentioned
earlier. As you know, the body can convert protein
to blood sugar, but it does so at a very slow rate,
and inefficiently. Serum insulin levels derived from
the phase II insulin response or even from insulin
injected before a meal are thus sufficient to prevent
a blood sugar rise from protein consumption. Fat cannot
be converted to blood sugar, and therefore doesn't
cause serum insulin levels or requirements for injected
insulin to increase. Say you eat an 8-ounce steak
with no carbohydrate side dish—this won't require
much insulin to keep your blood sugar steady, and
the lower insulin level will cause only a small amount
of the fat to be stored.
Now consider what would
happen if you ate the caloric equivalent of that steak
as a "fat-free" dessert. Your insulin level
has to jump dramatically in order to cover the carbohydrate
in the dessert. Remember, insulin is the fat-building
and fat-storage hormone. Since it's dessert, you probably
won't be going out to run a marathon after eating,
so the largest portion of your blood sugar won't get
burned. Instead much of it will be turned into fat
and stored.
Interestingly enough, eating
fat with carbohydrate can actually slow the digestion
of carbohydrate, so the jump in your insulin level
might thereby be slowed down. This would probably
be relatively effective if you're talking about eating
salad with vinegar-and-oil dressing. But if you're
eating a regular dessert, or a baked potato with your
steak, the slowdown in digestion would not prevent
blood sugar elevation in a diabetic.
Much of the reason Arctic
explorer Stefansson and his colleague came out of
their year-long meat-only diet thinner and with lowered
cholesterol levels was that their blood sugar wasn't
getting kicked up by carbohydrate—since they ate none.
Despite what the popular
media would have us believe, fat is not evil. In fact,
many researchers are becoming quite concerned about
the dangerous potential of "fat substitutes."
Fat is absolutely necessary for survival. Much of
the brain is constructed from fatty acids. Without
essential fatty acids—which, like essential amino
acids, cannot be manufactured by the body and must
be eaten—you would die. Fat substitutes such as the
recently FDA-approved Olestra bring about the spectre
of people trying to subsist on a no-fat diet, a diet
that could kill them. (Olestra actually robs the body
of important vitamins and fats, and the FDA has required
that it contain additives of those vitamins. In test
markets, some consumers have been made quite ill by
the product, while others don't see any effect. I
don't recommend it—it's completely unnecessary.)
Diabetics are affected
disproportionately by diseases such as atherosclerosis.
This has led to the long-standing myth that diabetics
have abnormal lipid profiles because they eat more
fat than nondiabetics.* It was likewise thought that
dietary fat caused all the long-term complications
of diabetes. For many years, this was taken as gospel
by most in the medical community. In truth, however,
the high lipid profiles in many diabetics with uncontrolled
blood sugar have nothing to do with the fat they consume.
Most diabetics consume very little fat—they've been
conditioned to fear it. High lipid profiles are a
symptom not of excess dietary fat, but of high blood
sugars. Indeed, even in most nondiabetics, the consumption
of fat has little if anything to do with their lipid
profiles.
On the other hand, high
consumption of carbohydrate, as we will discuss shortly,
can cause nondiabetics to develop some of the complications
usually associated with diabetes.
When I was on a very low
fat, high-carbohydrate diet thirty years ago, I had
high triglycerides (usually over 250 mg/dl) and high
serum cholesterol (usually over 300 mg/dl), and I
developed a number of vascular complications. When
I went onto a very low carbohydrate diet and did not
restrict my fat, the same thing happened to me that
happened to Arctic explorer Stefansson, but more so—my
lipids plummeted. Now, at sixty-three, I have the
lipid profile of an Olympic athlete, apparently from
eating a low-carbohydrate diet in order to normalize
my blood sugars. That I exercise regularly probably
doesn't hurt my lipid profile, either—but I was also
exercising when my lipid profile was abnormal.
Dare your physician. Ask
him or her if his lipid profile on a low-fat diet
can remotely compare to mine, on a high-fat, low-carbohydrate
diet:
- LDL—the "bad" cholesterol—83
(below 130 is considered normal)
- HDL—the "good" cholesterol—110
(above 30 is considered normal)
- Triglycerides— 45 (below 150 is
considered normal)
- Lipoprotein(a)—undetectable (below
60 is considered normal)
Contrary to popular myth, fat
is not a demon. It's the body's way of storing energy.
Without essential fatty acids, your body would cease
to function.
PAGE
1 2
3